Piwkowski - challenged an opponent with a push from behind.

Pearson - 2 opponents were going to a free ball and collided, there was no foul committed. The ball ran on to a Re/Max player. I stopped play as the D'Angelo player stayed down and appeared to be holding his face. After a few minutes he got to his feet and was ok to continue. I indicated play would start with a dropped ball to Re/Max, as they were in possession. Pearson immediately challenged my call claiming that the collision was a foul and the Re/Max player had deliberately elbowed the opponent. When I indicated for him to come to me so that I could explain the call he claimed that I always had it in for him personally. I told him to calm down but he turned away and continued to claim I was against him and had it in for him. I issued a caution for dissent. In reality Pearson was in a bad temper due to the score line.

Conditions acceptable. Agreement with convenors prior to the game that we would have a water break at mid-point in the half. During the 2nd half water break one player complained that because they had 5 subs I shouldn't be allowing the break.
One player was told to remove his watch as he only had a flimsy piece of cloth covering it.
St. Johns were not in attendance at all on the day.
We still have players contesting the no watches or jewellery mandate. One claimed that he "has worn it for 25 years, what's the difference now".
It is obvious from comments made, that team convenors have still not passed on the information regarding watches, acceptable coverings, jewellery etc to their players.